Wednesday 14 July 2010

Adventures in Netbook Land (3) – Bye bye XP

In my previous post Adventure in Netbook Land (1) and (2), I described my struggle to satisfactorily set up my Aspire One netbook for work and leisure. First it used the 'built-in' Linpus OS which I quickly discarded, and then installed Windows XP, which didn't go as smoothly as planed.


With a hard drive with barely 8 GB of space, one will run very quickly into trouble. I did.

Once more, I went through different steps to reduce the disk space usage, but I finally conceded that I needed to increase it. The most obvious thing would be to move all the personal documents/photos/music/videos to another drive, and reassign My Documents to the new drive. Fair enough. The only qualm I have with that, in my setting, is that there is a whole load of stuff hidden in my profile that is stored by Chrome, Firefox, and other programs, which is taking a lot of space.

The best solution I thought of was to actually move Users and Documents to another drive. It's not easy to do, as there's a lot involved within the OS, but it works. My second drive is a 8GB SD card inserted in the Storage Expansion slot.

On restart, I was very happy to see that my main hard disk had now ample space, and so had my second drive.

Yes, but.

Flashfire only seems to work on the main drive, and now a lot of the temporary stuff applications write to being on my second drive. And soon, performance degraded enough for me to decide to do away with Windows XP.

Some might say that by simply upgrading my RAM to 1GB and changing my SSD to a small ipod HDD would cure all my woes, but would miss the point. I don't want to upgrade, and I don't want to fiddle with the hardware.


So, it was bye bye XP and welcome Ubuntu.

Adventures in Netbook Land (2) – Installing Windows XP

As mentioned in my previous post Adventure in Netbook Land (1), my Aspire One netbook came with Linpus as OS.

At first glance, Acer's customized Linpus looks OK, very much like Ubuntu Netbook remit, except it has a green theme(like Mint). It seems to have the minimum amount of applications to get you started, and has the wonderful capability of detecting the SD card you insert in the slot, and automatically assigning it as extended disk space – very neat.

Yet it felt sluggish, somehow. Although optimized for the netbook (Cheese Webcam Booth included), and supposedly using little RAM compared to most OS, loading applications seemed slow. Furthermore, the default applications looked underwhelming in a strange way. Finally, I could not seem to find an easy way to update or upgrade applications, and in no small part caused by a lack of disk space (!). Tried to free some disk space but got really confused with the file system, the use of the SD card, etc.

My friend Jon lent me an external DVD drive and a pen drive with Ubuntu Netbook Remit. I still had a CD of Windows XP somewhere, so I decided to wipe my netbook clean and see what performance I would get from Windows XP.


Installation from CD went fine, albeit taking a while. Having worked with newer OS such as Ubuntu, OS.X, or Vista/Windows 7, I had forgotten how much time and user interaction XP needs. I must confess I am a little fussy about languages, Unicode, etc. that Windows throws in, and I go through the whole region/country/language customization process, checking every menu and screen so as not to get surprises later on.

None of the drivers are found/installed, so there is no sound, no network, basic 800x600 display, etc.

Fortunately, I had downloaded the drivers from Acer's web site and had them on a pen drive (USB works so-so). I copied them on the hard drive and installed them one by one starting with processor and bus, and ending with camera. Everything worked fine.

I had forgotten how little disk space XP first uses (before updates and 'extras' such as Net.2.0, etc. So I was happily surprised at first. I installed Chrome (I stopped using IE for many years for obvious reasons, and will never use it again, as there's absolutely no reason to do it, even the newer version) and was surfing the web OK.


Didn't last long though, performance got sluggish very quickly. After doing some investigation, I came to the conclusion that the problem was with the built-in SSD.

SSD are – overall – very fast, compared to mechanic disk drives. This reputation mainly comes from the fact that Read-access is way faster, enabling a SSD equiped laptop to start-up seemingly in seconds and load applications and documents in milliseconds compared to a laptop with even a 10,000 RPM disk drive. Now, most recent SSD models also boast decent write performances.

This is not the case with this netbook's 8.0 GB SSD. It is, in fact, a well known problems, and there are numerous blogs or help requests on the Internet about it. Of all the different tips and work-around to alleviate the issue, the best one I found was to install Flashfire (http://flashfire.org/xe/).

Flashfire web site describes it as a software for Solid-State Drives that host RAM to enhance random write performance of a SSD and is especially useful for the system using low-end SSDs. That very much explains what it is and how it works. And yes, it works. Very well.

With Flashfire, my netbook magically started to perform like a full blown laptop. I loved it.

Once more, this was to be short lived.

The first serious problem I had was with Windows Update. After an update that required a restart, my netbook kept crashing before I even managed to log in. As I investigated, I found out that the update could not finish its task on reboot because of Flashfire. Even when starting the XP in Safe Mode. After trying every trick I knew to no avail, I decided to reinstall Windows from scratch, apply ALL updates, install Flashfire, and turn the updates off. Once again, my netbook was working great.

Wednesday 30 June 2010

Adventures in Netbook land (1)

For my birthday, the family gave me some money to buy a netbook. There were surprised frowns all over -- why would I want a netbook, and not a laptop? -- but everyone helped.
I went on ebay, and started a few days (weeks?) of intensive search.

It's amazing the number of adverts or sales posters for cheap out-of-China WinCE netbooks. I mean, come on! WinCE? Even smartphone manufacturers are moving away from WinCE. Why would anyone want such a netbook: crammed ram (256M), crammed space (1G), crammed apps, and no upgradability? Beats me, but there we are, ebay is full of them...

Between the HP, Asus, Acer, and other brands, I decided to go for the Acer Aspire One range: they've got decent hardware, lot of options, are upgradable, seem to go on for ever, and sell for a good price The thing is, all these netbooks sell like hot cake and I was constantly outbidded. Until I sneaked in to snap the netbook I now own.

I really like my Aspire One. I like its weight and size, the keyboard feel, the fact that it's got all those ports, that the display is very good, the sound is OK, and the webcam is fine.

I didn't like the OS it came with - Linpus - even if it was very fast and did a cool thing with SD card (automatically extend the system disk space by inserting the SD card).

So I decided to work on finding a nice OS for my nice little Netbook

Tuesday 8 June 2010

Hackers target Windows-based phones | IT PRO

Hackers target Windows-based phones | IT PRO

Just goes to show that it is NOT a question of market share. Microsoft trails Nokia, RIM (Blackberry) and Apple by a huge margin.

Adobe admits critical Flash flaw | IT PRO

Adobe admits critical Flash flaw | IT PRO

Finally! Although I don't see lots of magazines and newspapers publicizing the news. Bias? You bet.

Thursday 20 May 2010

Adobe's losing battle

To be honest I never have been a Flash fan (and not really a Java-on-Windows fan either). The reasons are the same as most people who dislike it: performance, resource hog, not really great quality, 'lazy' applications, etc.

Over the years, I have seen many sites go from no-flash to flash back to no-flash. Once the novelty of the little kind-of-app-with-fancy-graphics wears off, users who are left with having to wait for ever for a page to load, or having the browser give up the ghost, or wanting to go straight to the point, end up frustrated.

The world of browsers, spurred on by Safari's and Chrome's webkit engine performance has increased its speed by leaps and bounds. Firefox is staying close to these two with the latest Gekko updates, and IE - the snail of browsers (still today) - is doing its best to be fast...

Web sites that do NOT use flash, have extremely fast load times, even with complicated CSS and java script usage. But not so with flash.

In the world of mobiles, it's obvious, Flash is NOWHERE to be seen (well, there is Flash Lite for some - rare - smart-phones, but the truth is that it is OLD flash, and it is still a hog).

Flash's problem is that it is completely proprietary. The player is proprietary, and the tools are proprietary. The content is not, of course, hence the reason why programmer will say it is not, and they will show Flash specifications to confirm it. But the truth is, Flash is proprietary. Adobe rules supreme over the present and future of Flash, its players, and its tools.

I understand Adobe's position. They make A LOT of money from Flash, even if the player is free. Until HTML 5 came along, Flash was the de-facto standard for feature 'rich' web content ('rich' is a term that Microsoft - mainly Bill Gates - coined and used for anything and everything the company made, and is now used everywhere to mean anything from 'not character based', to 'whooping 3D with surround sound and mouse gesture word processor').

The truth is, the Web doesn't NEED flash. It may look convenient, but its convenience made for lazy programming and lazy design. I mean: how many times has an awarded web site been a heavy user of Flash? The technology itself may have been OK in a PC-centric world, but its proprietary nature, its poor resulting applications (let's be honest, in the main, Flash applications are not THAT great, are they?), and its performance is a NO-GO in a mobile-centric world.

Hence the aggressive PR battle that Adobe is forging against Apple, the convenient scapegoat to gloss over the inadequacies and lies of Flash.

The fact is, the main programmers of Flash applications are Windows guys. The Linux world hardly uses Flash, Mac users hate it, and it is quasi non-existent in the mobile world. However, this is not advertised by Adobe or their Flash proponents (who make a comfortable living from making applications with it).

Real programmers (sorry to the others), designers of elegant and performing web sites, don't use Flash, and are looking at HTML 5 specifications with a lot of interest. And so are CEOs, CIOs, CFOs, CTOs, COOs, who see where the shift in consumer usage is going: Smart phones, very portable computers (desktop computer purchase is now lagging behind laptops and netbooks by a significant margin), mobile activity. And they are moving their web sites to no-flash content in increasing measure.

The snowball is gathering momentum.

As every passes Flash is losing ground.

Adobe is losing its battle. Bye bye Flash. And good riddance.